I also have some radio shack their NiMH Rechargable batteries they work quite well but I have made some external batteries and really just leave them in because they need to be to use the camera. The camera purchase (finally setting on the Nikon Coolpix 990)! Is there really such a big difference between chargers? Is it worthĭoing hours of research on this? I already spent WEEKS researching Quick chargers - that they weren't as good as the slower chargers. MAHA rechargers, and one note which discouraged people from buying Tonight I looked thru this forum and found lots of comments about the It takes about 1.5-2 hours to charge them. Also bought 4 of their NiMH Rechargable batteries ($17.99įor 4). Last week I bought a "1-Hour AA & AAA Battery Charger" at RadioShack.
Radio shack battery charger o7a06 free#
I would keep the Radioshack charger, much as I recommend the MAHA (it came with a FREE car lighter adaptor which is nice when on a long road tour, to keep the spare sets ready. After about 20 charge cycles they last approximately (see above) as long as when I bought them. One reason I consider the charge rate to be well within the batteries limits. Others have reported batteries getting hot, not here. I would consider a 2 hour a medium charge. I dont recall seeing the MAHA advertised as quick charge. Cant tell the difference really as I dont keep books on either the time or the number of pictures I get from a fresh set. I use both MAHA batteries and Radioshack. Charge time does not bother me one way or the other (always do it before I retire). For what its worth, I bought the MAHA C204F and like it.
0 kommentar(er)
